#MAC CAMP TERMINAL EMULATOR ARCHIVE#
#MAC CAMP TERMINAL EMULATOR SOFTWARE#

Local customization to be parameters plus object code, not source code.

Linux adoption, it is the two factors I name above.Д¬ustomers are pressing to have exits go away. I would assert it is not the availability of the source code that is driving Utilize the source code of the open source products you are using? Are youД®xamining the source to find problems? Are you making local modifications? *Am I wrong? Those of you who work for conventional 'enterprises' (notД¬onsultants, hobbyists or vendors) - do you see your company seriously that is very attractive: it decouples technology ('spin up another Linux

#MAC CAMP TERMINAL EMULATOR SOFTWARE#

Today if you had to pay $10,000 for your first license? And running moreД¬opies or more MIPS of Linux does not directly increase your software costs How many companies would be running Linux Not the availability of source* per se but the fact that you can start forДЇree and decouple growth and cost. I think what attracts enterprise customers is Send email to with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

#MAC CAMP TERMINAL EMULATOR ARCHIVE#

Have to pay a reasonable license fee and can only provide my changes toДЄre you actually seeing resistance to priced software, or only to OCOДЇor IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, My preference isДЇor well maintained software to which I can easily make local changes. There's room for both open source and proprietary software. In other words, they *want* localД¬ustomization to be parameters plus object code, not source code. To do with a piece of assembler source if you gave it to them.

Many, many customers nowadays would not know what ?'ДЇrankly I don't think I have seen any resistance to OCO in twenty years, Tom Brennan's Vista - my preferred emulator but not an option for the Mac - costs $30 for a single user.ДЇrom: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Why are computer people so loathe to financially reward computer people? Why the determination not to financially reward the developers for their efforts? Why would I hypothetically write a 3270 emulator if it's not important enough to pay for? If I have to pay a reasonable license fee and can only provide my changes to people who are licensed, that's fine.ДЄre you actually seeing resistance to priced software, or only to OCO software?ДЇrom: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Charles Mills Saturday, Ma5:04 PM

My preference is for well maintained software to which I can easily make local changes.

Mac camp terminal emulator